This seems like too strong a statement:
"Python 2.6 and Python 2.7 support syntax features from Python 3 which for
the most part make a unified code base possible. Many thought that the
unicode_literals future import might make a common source possible, but it
turns out that it's doing more harm than good."
While it may be true for *some* problem domains, such as WSGI apps, it is not
true in general, IMO. I use this future import all the time in both libraries
and applications and it's almost always helpful.
Cheers,
-Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4