On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote: > We have two similar proposals, PEPs 407 and 413, to speed up the release of > at least library changes. To me, both have major problems with version > numbering. > > I think the underlying problem is starting with a long-term fixed leading > '3', which conveys no information about current and future changes (at least > for another decade). Correct, but the still ongoing challenges of the 2 -> 3 transition make that approach, as logical as it may be, entirely unworkable from a PR point of view. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4