RetroSearch Browse

Sun Feb 26 04:13:26 CET 2012 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-February/116838.html

If this can encourage more projects to support Python 3 (even if it's
only 3.3 and later) and hence improve adoption of Python 3, I'm all
for it.

A small quibble: I'd like to see a benchmark of a 'u' function implemented in C.

--Guido

On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Armin Ronacher
<armin.ronacher at active-4.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just uploaded PEP 414 which proposes am optional 'u' prefix for string
> literals for Python 3.
>
> You can read the PEP online: http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0414/
>
> This is a followup to the discussion about this topic here on the
> mailinglist and on twitter/IRC over the last few weeks.
>
>
> Regards,
> Armin
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-February/116838.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 414 - Unicode Literals for Python 3