On Feb 24, 2012 6:26 PM, "Mark Lawrence" <breamoreboy at yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > > On 24/02/2012 21:37, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: >>> >>> I was of the thought that Old String Formatting |"%s" % foo| was to be >>> phased out by Advanced String Formatting |"{}.format(foo)|. >> >> >> This is actually not the case, and never was. Some people would indeed >> like to see that happen, and others are strongly opposed. >> >> As a consequence, both APIs for formatting will coexist for a long time >> to come (ten years at least); no deprecation is planned. >> >> Regards, >> Martin > > > <quote> > Quoting the docs http://docs.python.org/py3k/library/stdtypes.html > > 4.6.2. Old String Formatting Operations > > Note > > The formatting operations described here are obsolete and may go away in future versions of Python. Use the new String Formatting in new code. > > </quote> > > I think this is daft because all of the code has to be supported for the ten years that MVL has suggested. I suggest a plan that says something like:- > > Until Python 3.5 both methods of string formatting will be supported. > In Python 3.6 the the old formating style will be deprecated. > In Python 3.7 the old style is dead. > > I'm fully aware that it isn't likely to be that easy, I'm simply trying to spark ideas from the core developers and users who are in a far better situation to judge this situation than I am. -infinity. We can't do that as outlined earlier in the thread. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20120224/8740ab3e/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4