On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 01:15, Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen at xemacs.org> wrote: > Brian Curtin writes: > > > If you want to contribute to development, I think you'll know that a > > link about development is relevant. > > For values of "you" in "experienced programmers", yes. But > translators and tech writers don't consider what they do to be > "development." I don't know what this is saying, but I'll guess it's some suggestion that we should still name the link "Contributing". Keep in mind that the current "Core Development" link on the front page goes directly to http://docs.python.org/devguide/ -- getting this page in people's hands earlier is a Good Thing. However, this is not a correct link from something named "Contributing". It would have to say "Contributing Code", but then it leaves out docs and translations and our resident spelling bee contestants. Paint the bike shed any way you want except the plain "Contributing" color, please.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4