A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-February/116539.html below:

the implementation is ready for a review

[Python-Dev] PEP 410 (Decimal timestamp): the implementation is ready for a review [Python-Dev] PEP 410 (Decimal timestamp): the implementation is ready for a reviewBen Finney ben+python at benfinney.id.au
Thu Feb 16 04:12:41 CET 2012
Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> writes:

> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
> > It probably isn't worth the bother for things like file timestamps,
> > where the time taken to execute the system call that modifies the
> > file is likely to be several orders of magnitude larger.
>
> Ironically, file timestamps are likely the only place where it
> matters. Read the rest of the thread.

And log message timestamps. The *two* only places where it matters, file
timestamps and log messages.

And communication protocols. The *three* only places –

I'll come in again.

-- 
 \      “Why should I care about posterity? What's posterity ever done |
  `\                                            for me?” —Groucho Marx |
_o__)                                                                  |
Ben Finney

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4