RetroSearch Browse

Wed Feb 15 14:21:37 CET 2012 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-February/116501.html

> I'd like to remind people what the original point of the PEP process
> was: to avoid going in cycles in discussions. To achieve this, the PEP
> author is supposed to record all objections in the PEP, even if he
> disagrees (and may state rebuttals for each objection that people
> brought up).
>
> So, Victor: please record all objections in a separate section of the
> PEP, rather than just rebutting in them in the PEP (as is currently the
> case).

Ok, I will try to list alternatives differently, e.g. by listing also
advantages. I didn't know what a PEP is supposed to contain.

Victor

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-February/116501.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 410 (Decimal timestamp): the implementation is ready for a review