A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-February/116428.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 411: Provisional packages in the Python standard library

[Python-Dev] PEP 411: Provisional packages in the Python standard library [Python-Dev] PEP 411: Provisional packages in the Python standard libraryIsaac Morland ijmorlan at uwaterloo.ca
Sat Feb 11 17:45:05 CET 2012
On Sat, 11 Feb 2012, Steven D'Aprano wrote:

> Arguably, the canonical test for whether a package is provisional or not 
> should be the existence of __provisional__:
>
>
> for package in packages:
>    if hasattr(package, '__provisional__')
>        assert package documentation includes boilerplate
>    else:
>        assert package documentation does not includes boilerplate

Could the documentation generator simply insert the boilerplate if and 
only if the package has the __provisional__ attribute?  I'm not an expert 
in Python documentation but isn't it generated from properly-formatted 
comments within the Python source?

Isaac Morland			CSCF Web Guru
DC 2554C, x36650		WWW Software Specialist
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4