On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at haypocalc.com> wrote: >>>> changeset: 74832:f8409b3d6449 >>>> user: Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at haypocalc.com> >>>> date: Wed Feb 08 14:31:50 2012 +0100 >>>> summary: >>>> PEP 410 >>> >>> Ah, even when written by a core dev, a PEP should still be at Accepted >>> before we check anything in. PEP 410 is still at Draft. >> >> Never mind, I just saw the checkin that reverted the change. > > Yeah, I should use a clone of the repository instead of always working > in the same repository. I pushed the commit by mistake. It is > difficult to manipulate such huge patch. I just created a clone on my > computer to avoid similar mistakes :-) I maintain a separate sandbox clone for the same reason. I think I'm finally starting to get the hang of the mq extension for working with smaller "not yet ready" changes, too. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4