On 2012-02-08 09:28, Simon Cross wrote: > I think I'm -1 on a "locale" encoding because it refers to different > actual encodings depending on where and when it's run, which seems > surprising, and there's already a more explicit way to achieve the > same effect. I'd agree that this is undesirable, and I don't really want locale-specific behaviour to leak out in other places that accept a encoding name (eg <?xml encoding="locale"?>), but we already have this behaviour with the "mbcs" encoding on Windows which refers to the locale-specific 'ANSI' code page. -- And Clover mailto:and at doxdesk.com http://www.doxdesk.com/ gtalk:chat?jid=bobince at doxdesk.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4