On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at gmail.com> wrote: > Besides, in http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-December/114812.html > Stefan Behnel said "[...] Today, ET is *only* being maintained in the > stdlib by Florent Xicluna [...]". Is this not true? I don't know. I took this to be an observation rather than a declaration of intent by the package owner (Fredrik Lundh). > P.S. Would declaring that xml.etree is now independently maintained by > pydev be a bad thing? Why? So long as Fredrik owns the package, I think forking it for the standard library would be a bad thing, though not for technical reasons. Fredrik provided his libraries for the standard library in good faith, and we still list him as the external maintainer. Until *that* changes, forking would be inappropriate. I'd much rather see a discussion with Fredrik about the future maintenance plan for ElementTree and cElementTree. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at acm.org> "A person who won't read has no advantage over one who can't read." --Samuel Langhorne Clemens
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4