On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 14:49, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > On Mon, 6 Feb 2012 09:57:56 -0500 > Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote: > > Thanks for any help people can provide me on this now 5 year quest to get > > this work finished. > > Do you have any plan to solve the performance issue? > I have not even looked at performance or attempted to profile the code, so I suspect there is room for improvement. > > $ ./python -m timeit -s "import sys; mod='struct'" \ > "__import__(mod); del sys.modules[mod]" > 10000 loops, best of 3: 75.3 usec per loop > $ ./python -m timeit -s "import sys; mod='struct'; from importlib import > __import__" \ > "__import__(mod); del sys.modules[mod]" > 1000 loops, best of 3: 421 usec per loop > > Startup time is already much worse in 3.3 than in 2.7. With such a > slowdown in importing fresh modules, applications using many batteries > (third-party or not) will be heavily impacted. > I have a benchmark suite for importing modules directly at importlib.test.benchmark, but it doesn't explicitly cover searching far down sys.path. I will see if any of the existing tests implicitly do that and if not add it. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20120207/305a1b49/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4