Guido van Rossum wrote: > On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us> wrote: >>> Nick Coghlan wrote: >>>> FWIW, I expect the implementation will *allow* "raise exc from >>>> Ellipsis" as an odd synonym for "raise exc". >>> >>> Are we sure we want that? Raising from something not an exception seems >>> counter-intuitive (None being the obvious exception). >> It isn't so much a matter of wanting it as "Is it problematic enough >> to put any effort into preventing it?" (since allowing it is a natural >> outcome of the obvious implementation). > > I would say yes we want that. It would be strange if you couldn't > reset a variable explicitly to its default value. I don't expect > people to do this often. But somebody might want to do a deep copy of > an exception (with some systematic change), or there might be other > reasons. I'm sure a few Python zen items apply here. :-) Okey-doke, I'll get it going. ~Ethan~
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4