On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Cameron Simpson <cs at zip.com.au> wrote: > On 29Dec2012 21:16, Lennart Regebro <regebro at gmail.com> wrote: > | On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> > wrote: > | > Why should we care about that situation if we *do* provide a database? > | > Distributions can decide to exclude some files from their packages, but > | > it's their problem, not ours. > | > | Yes, but a comprehensible error message is useful even if somebody messed > | up the system/configuration. > > Couldn't you just agree to augument the exception with some "I looked > here, there and there" information. It avoids a lot of bikeshedding and > makes things clear. You're not diagnosing system misconfiguration, just > saying "I can't find stuff, and here is where I looked". > Since the location of the tzdata-update package isn't a fixed place it's hard to say "I looked here, there and there", though. I don't think anyone has suggested making any diagnostics. :-) //Lennart -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20121230/8dd643ef/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4