On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Sven Brauch <svenbrauch at googlemail.com> wrote: > Hello! > > I'm writing a static language analyzer for an IDE which reuses the > CPython parser (for parsing) [1]. Two years ago, I asked about a few > changes to be made to the AST provided by CPython, but the discussion > thread dried up before a definite decision was made. I decided to just > copy the parser code to my project and make the necessary changes > there back then. I'm bringing this up again now since after my project > has seen its first release recently, packagers are (understandably) a > bit unhappy about the python fork residing in its repository. I would > really like to get rid of that fork and link against the vanilla > libpython instead. It certainly sounds like its worth considering for 3.4. It's a new feature, though, so it unfortunately wouldn't be possible to backport it to any earlier releases. Regards, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4