A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-December/123166.html below:

[Python-Dev] Downloads page: Which version of Python should be listed first?

[Python-Dev] Downloads page: Which version of Python should be listed first?Ross Lagerwall rosslagerwall at gmail.com
Thu Dec 13 22:14:51 CET 2012
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 07:57:52AM +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
> The default version shown on http://docs.python.org/ is now 3.3.0,
> which I think is a Good Thing. However, http://python.org/download/
> puts 2.7 first, and says:
> 
> """If you don't know which version to use, start with Python 2.7; more
> existing third party software is compatible with Python 2 than Python
> 3 right now."""
> 
> Firstly, is this still true? (I wouldn't have a clue.) And secondly,
> would this be better worded as "one's better but the other's a good
> fall-back"? Something like:
> 
> """Don't know which version to use? Python 3.3 is the recommended
> version for new projects, but much existing software is compatible
> with Python 2."""
> 

I would say listing 3.3 as the recommended version to use is a good
thing, especially as distros like Ubuntu and Fedora transition to Python
3. It also makes sense, given that the docs default to 3.3.

-- 
Ross Lagerwall
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4