On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote: > On Dec 12, 2012, at 01:14 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > >>That's a backwards compatibility risk, though - many applications are >>likely coping just fine with the slightly corrupted time values, but would >>fall over if an exception was raised instead. Right. >>The default should probably >>be chosen so that the single argument form of these calls continues to >>behave the same in 3.4 as it does in 3.3, emitting a DeprecationWarning to >>say that the default behaviour is going to change in 3.5 (so the *actual* >>default would be sentinel value, in order to tell the difference between an >>explicit True being passed and relying on the default behaviour). > > +1 I don't think it's worth deprecating the old behavior. -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4