A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-December/123078.html below:

[Python-Dev] More compact dictionaries with faster iteration

[Python-Dev] More compact dictionaries with faster iteration [Python-Dev] More compact dictionaries with faster iterationRaymond Hettinger raymond.hettinger at gmail.com
Tue Dec 11 00:44:49 CET 2012
On Dec 10, 2012, at 1:38 PM, PJ Eby <pje at telecommunity.com> wrote:

> Without numbers it's hard to say for certain, but the advantage to
> keeping ordered dictionaries a distinct type is that the standard
> dictionary type can then get that extra bit of speed in exchange for
> dropping the ordering requirement.

I expect that dicts and OrderedDicts will remain separate 
for reasons of speed, space, and respect for people's mental models.


Raymond
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20121210/e3a3a047/attachment.html>
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4