On 12/04/2012 04:10 AM, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote: > This also brings me to a single question I have for your proposal: Why > did you create another DSL instead of using Python, i.e. instead of > using cog directly? Looking at the above, I could imagine this being > written like this instead: Actually my original prototype was written using Cog. When I showed it to Guido at EuroPython, he suggested a DSL instead, as writing raw Python code for every single function would be far too wordy. I agree. //arry/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20121204/7877d0bb/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4