A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-December/122925.html below:

[Python-Dev] Proposing "Argument Clinic", a new way of specifying arguments to builtins for CPython

[Python-Dev] Proposing "Argument Clinic", a new way of specifying arguments to builtins for CPython [Python-Dev] Proposing "Argument Clinic", a new way of specifying arguments to builtins for CPythonBarry Warsaw barry at python.org
Mon Dec 3 23:37:13 CET 2012
On Dec 03, 2012, at 02:29 PM, Larry Hastings wrote:

>4) Builtin function arguments are defined in a small DSL; these
>    are expanded to code and data using a custom compile-time
>    preprocessor step.
>
>All the core devs I've asked said "given all that, I'd prefer the
>hairy preprocessor macros".  But by the end of the conversation
>they'd changed their minds to prefer the custom DSL.  Maybe I'll
>make a believer out of you too--read on!

The biggest question with generated code is always the effect on debugging.
How horrible will it be when I have to step through argument parsing to figure
out what's going wrong?

-Barry
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4