RetroSearch Browse

Wed Aug 29 06:45:04 CEST 2012 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-August/121522.html

Hm. I would be fine with the edits proposed, no need to bother others. But
please do use the Hg repo. :-)

On Tuesday, August 28, 2012, Chris Angelico wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> > Sending a patch to the PEP editors (peps at python.org <javascript:;>) or
> posting it to
> > the tracker is likely the best option. However, in the general case,
> > we don't worry too much about minor errors in accepted and final PEPs
> > - once the PEP is implemented, they're mostly historical records
> > rather than reference documents
>
> Thanks. I'll not worry about it then; PEP 393 is final.
>
> ChrisA
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org <javascript:;>
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org
>

-- 
Sent from Gmail Mobile
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20120828/64e99308/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-August/121522.html below:

[Python-Dev] Copyediting PEPs