On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > Sending a patch to the PEP editors (peps at python.org) or posting it to > the tracker is likely the best option. However, in the general case, > we don't worry too much about minor errors in accepted and final PEPs > - once the PEP is implemented, they're mostly historical records > rather than reference documents Thanks. I'll not worry about it then; PEP 393 is final. ChrisA
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4