On Tuesday, August 28, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Donald Stufft <donald.stufft at gmail.com (mailto:donald.stufft at gmail.com)> wrote: > > Please, don't. The software and infrastructure to run PyPI exists. > Some level of namespacing makes sense to separate out extension > management to different groups of people, but creating a whole > management application just for this would be serious overkill. > How do you deal with a PyPI package foo which wants a bar-test value (foo-bar-test), and a PyPI package foo-bar with a value test (foo-bar-test). PyPI packages allow too much in the way of names to be able to fully namespace it without collisions. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20120828/3bd4ef5b/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4