RetroSearch Browse

Tue Aug 28 17:05:39 CEST 2012 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-August/121499.html

On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Donald Stufft <donald.stufft at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 28, 2012 at 10:43 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>
> I'm happy for PyPI to host such a registry. A specificaion for the
> registry should be part of the PEP for the 1.3 format, but I would
> propose this structure (without having researched in detail what
> other registries feature, but with a rough idea what IANA registries
> typically include):
>
> PyPI packages itself could serve as a registry, but I like the idea of
> a separate registry better in many ways because it lets you divorce
> the namespace from the package. The question being would this
> be a x-registered-name type system or a registered-namespace-*
> type system?

Please, don't. The software and infrastructure to run PyPI exists.
Some level of namespacing makes sense to separate out extension
management to different groups of people, but creating a whole
management application just for this would be serious overkill.

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-August/121499.html below:

[Python-Dev] Edits to Metadata 1.2 to add extras (optional dependencies)