On 28.08.2012 06:22, Petri Lehtinen wrote: > Georg Brandl wrote: >> Changes to the default branch must be bugfix-only. The 3.4 development >> only opens when the 3.3 branch is created, which happens after the >> release of 3.3.0 final. >> >> Changes made in default and not cherry-picked to the 3.3.0 release clone >> will therefore end up in 3.3.1 and 3.4. > > Where should I put the news entry for fixes that will go to 3.3.1? The > top item in Misc/NEWS is 3.3.0 RC 2. The stuff in your private clone > will be released as 3.3.0, so can a 3.3.1 entry be added to the > default branch of the public repo now? Yes. > And if changes like this are added now, they will be included in 3.2.4 > but not in 3.3.0. Is this bad? Sounds fine to me. Georg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4