A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-August/121471.html below:

[Python-Dev] Edits to Metadata 1.2 to add extras (optional dependencies)

[Python-Dev] Edits to Metadata 1.2 to add extras (optional dependencies) [Python-Dev] Edits to Metadata 1.2 to add extras (optional dependencies)Petri Lehtinen petri at digip.org
Tue Aug 28 06:15:52 CEST 2012
Daniel Holth wrote:
> I don't know of a tool that doesn't reliably ignore extra fields, but
> I will put you down as being in favor of an X- fields paragraph:
> 
> Extensions (X- Fields)
> ::::::::::::::::::::::
> 
> Metadata files can contain fields that are not part of
> the specification, called *extensions*. These fields start with
> with `X-`.

See RFC 6648 for why such X-fields may not be a good idea:

    http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6648
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4