Daniel Holth wrote: > I don't know of a tool that doesn't reliably ignore extra fields, but > I will put you down as being in favor of an X- fields paragraph: > > Extensions (X- Fields) > :::::::::::::::::::::: > > Metadata files can contain fields that are not part of > the specification, called *extensions*. These fields start with > with `X-`. See RFC 6648 for why such X-fields may not be a good idea: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6648
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4