Brett Cannon wrote: > > > On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Eric Snow <ericsnowcurrently at gmail.com > <mailto:ericsnowcurrently at gmail.com>> wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org > <mailto:brett at python.org>> wrote: > > It would also be very easy to expand importlib.abc.SourceLoader > to add a > > method which is called with source and returns the bytecode to be > written > > out > > Yes, please. Not having to hack around this would be nice. > > > http://bugs.python.org/issue15627 AST transformation is a lot more general than just optimization. Adding an AST transformation is a relatively painless way to add to Python the last element of lisp-ness that it lacks: Namely being able to treat code as data and transform it at runtime, after parsing but before execution. Some examples: Profiling code be added by an AST transformation. IMO this would have been a more elegant way to implement CProfile and similar profilers than the current approach. AST transformations allow DSLs to be implemented in Python (I don't know if that is a + or - ). Access to the AST of a function at runtime would also be of use to method-based dynamic optimizers, or dynamic de-optimizers for static compilers. All for the price of adding a single method to SourceLoader. What a bargain :) Cheers, Mark.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4