RetroSearch Browse

Sun Apr 29 14:39:01 CEST 2012 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-April/119129.html

On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 03:26:26 +0200
Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Guido,
> 
> 2012/4/28 Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org>:
> > I read most of the PEP and I think it is ready for acceptance! Thanks
> > for your patience in shepherding this through such a difficult and
> > long discussion.
> 
> You're welcome, but many developers helped me!
> 
> > Also thanks to the many other contributors,
> > especially those who ended up as co-authors. We will have an awesome
> > new set of time APIs! Now let the implementation roll...
> 
> The PEP is not accepted yet at:
> http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0418/
> 
> Did you forget to update its status, or are you waiting for something?
> 
> Anyway I commited the implementation of the PEP 418 (after the last
> change on the API of time.get_clock_info()). Let's see how buildbots
> feel with monotonic time.

Hopefully they'll be monotonously green!

cheers

Antoine.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-April/119129.html below:

[Python-Dev] [RFC] PEP 418: Add monotonic time, performance counter and process time functions