RetroSearch Browse

Sun Apr 29 03:26:26 CEST 2012 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-April/119118.html

Hi Guido,

2012/4/28 Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org>:
> I read most of the PEP and I think it is ready for acceptance! Thanks
> for your patience in shepherding this through such a difficult and
> long discussion.

You're welcome, but many developers helped me!

> Also thanks to the many other contributors,
> especially those who ended up as co-authors. We will have an awesome
> new set of time APIs! Now let the implementation roll...

The PEP is not accepted yet at:
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0418/

Did you forget to update its status, or are you waiting for something?

Anyway I commited the implementation of the PEP 418 (after the last
change on the API of time.get_clock_info()). Let's see how buildbots
feel with monotonic time.

Victor

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-April/119118.html below:

[Python-Dev] [RFC] PEP 418: Add monotonic time, performance counter and process time functions