Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-April/119070.html below:

[Python-Dev] Is it safe to assume that Python 2.7 is always built with unicode support?

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Is it safe to assume that Python 2.7 is always built with unicode support?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Close #10142: Support for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 17:07:46 +0200, Stefano Taschini <taschini at ieee.org> wrote:
> May I suggest that http://bugs.python.org/issue8767 be reopened, to make
> things clear?

Done.

--David

PS: we prefer no top-posting on this list.  It makes it far easier
to retain just enough context to make a message stand on its own
when properly edited.

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Is it safe to assume that Python 2.7 is always built with unicode support?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Close #10142: Support for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4