Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-April/118945.html below:

[Python-Dev] Expose dictproxy through collections rather than the types module?

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Handling deprecations in the face of PEP 384
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Expose dictproxy through collections rather than the types module?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

The internal dictproxy class was recently exposed as types.MappingProxyType.

Since it's not very discoverable that way, would anyone object if I
moved things around so it was exposed as collections.MappingProxy
instead? The main benefit to doing so is to get it into the table of
specialised container types at the top of the collections module docs
[1].

[1] http://docs.python.org/dev/library/collections

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Handling deprecations in the face of PEP 384
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Expose dictproxy through collections rather than the types module?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4