On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at gmail.com> wrote: > (quoting GvR) >> Let's change this to something more reasonable, e.g. >> >> """ >> If operators with different priorities are used, consider adding >> whitespace around the operators with the lowest priority(ies). This is >> very much to taste, however, never use more than one space, and always >> have the same amount of whitespace on both sides of a binary operator. >> """ > > +1, a very welcome change to a piece of PEP8 I've always felt > uncomfortable with. Tiny nitpick: I'd just replace the comma following > "however" with a period or semicolon. Following or preceding? Either works, but there's a slight shift of meaning depending on which punctuation gets the upgrade. What was the original intent of the paragraph? Chris Angelico
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4