RetroSearch Browse

Wed Apr 18 02:50:50 CEST 2012 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-April/118833.html

I'll do it. Give me a few days (tomorrow is fully booked with horrible
meetings).

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Victor Stinner
<victor.stinner at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Here is a simplified version of the first draft of the PEP 418. The
>> full version can be read online.
>> http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0418/
>>
>> The implementation of the PEP can be found in this issue:
>> http://bugs.python.org/issue14428
>
> The PEP is now fully ready: I just finished the implementation.
>
> It looks like people, who complained on older versions of the PEP,
> don't have new complain. Am I wrong? Everybody agree with the PEP 418?
>
> I created http://hg.python.org/features/pep418/ repository for the
> implementation. I tested it on Linux 3.3, FreeBSD 8.2, OpenBSD 5.0 and
> Windows Seven. The implementation is now waiting your review!
>
> There is also the toy implementation in pure Python for Python < 3.3:
> https://bitbucket.org/haypo/misc/src/tip/python/pep418.py
>
> Antoine asked "Is there a designated dictator for this PEP?". Nobody
> answered. Maybe Guido van Rossum?
>
> Victor
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-April/118833.html below:

[Python-Dev] [RFC] PEP 418: Add monotonic time, performance counter and process time functions