RetroSearch Browse

Wed Apr 18 02:06:39 CEST 2012 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-April/118832.html

> Here is a simplified version of the first draft of the PEP 418. The
> full version can be read online.
> http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0418/
>
> The implementation of the PEP can be found in this issue:
> http://bugs.python.org/issue14428

The PEP is now fully ready: I just finished the implementation.

It looks like people, who complained on older versions of the PEP,
don't have new complain. Am I wrong? Everybody agree with the PEP 418?

I created http://hg.python.org/features/pep418/ repository for the
implementation. I tested it on Linux 3.3, FreeBSD 8.2, OpenBSD 5.0 and
Windows Seven. The implementation is now waiting your review!

There is also the toy implementation in pure Python for Python < 3.3:
https://bitbucket.org/haypo/misc/src/tip/python/pep418.py

Antoine asked "Is there a designated dictator for this PEP?". Nobody
answered. Maybe Guido van Rossum?

Victor

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-April/118832.html below:

[Python-Dev] [RFC] PEP 418: Add monotonic time, performance counter and process time functions