On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 01:11:14 +0200, Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net> wrote: > On 16.04.2012 18:15, R. David Murray wrote: > > I don't see how depending on Cython is better than depending on having > > an existing Python. > > No, it's not just an existing Python, it is (at least currently) the same > version of Python being built. Therefore I wrote about the bootstrapping > problems when bytecode changes. Ah, yes, I had missed that subtlety. --David
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4