Am 16.04.2012 19:44, schrieb Antoine Pitrou: > On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 13:33:45 -0400 > Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 13:08, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote: >> >>>> So like execute hg diff on the dependent files and if nothing changed >>>> then touch the auto-generated file w/ 'touch' to prevent future attempts >>>> to execute the target? >>> >>> Exactly. There might be something better than hg diff, perhaps some form >>> of hg status. >>> >> >> Yeah, hg status is probably better. Now someone just needs to write the >> shell script. =) > > Wouldn't it be better if Python could compile regardless of the > presence of a hg repository? Who says it couldn't? Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4