On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 12:15:16 -0400 "R. David Murray" <rdmurray at bitdance.com> wrote: > > I don't see how depending on Cython is better than depending on having > an existing Python. If the only benefit is semi-readable code, surely > we do have source code for the pre-frozen module, and it is just a matter > of convincing hg that the bytecode is binary, not text? > > Brett's earlier thought of compiling from source as a *fallback* makes > sense to me. I'd rather not add overhead to startup that we can avoid. Compiling from source at which point, though? In essence, that would mean reimplement Python/freeze_importlib.py in C? We could even compile it to a separate executable that gets built before the Python executable (like pgen) :-) Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4