Go ahead and update the PEP! On Sunday, April 15, 2012, Victor Stinner wrote: > Hi, > > The frozendict (PEP 416) was rejected, but I just added the > types.MappingProxyType. This type is not new, it existed since Python > 2.2 as the internal dict_proxy type. See also the issue #14386. > > I would like to know if I can edit the rejected PEP, or if Guido > prefers to do it, to mention the new type? The "Rejection Notice" > section currently ends with "On the other hand, exposing the existing > read-only dict proxy as a built-in type sounds good to me. (It would > need to be changed to allow calling the constructor.) GvR." > > Victor > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org <javascript:;> > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org > -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20120415/eeb3c1bf/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4