On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:25, Mark Shannon <mark at hotpy.org> wrote: > I would like to get the new shared-keys dictionary implementation > committed, or rejected or further reviewed, if necessary. > It seems to have got a bit stuck at the moment. > > As far as I am concerned it is ready to go in. > Memory usage is reduced, speed is roughly unchanged, and it passes all > the tests (except for 1 test in test_pprint which relies on dict/set > ordering, see http://bugs.python.org/**issue13907<http://bugs.python.org/issue13907> > ) > The language summit result was this should go in once the review is over (as Antoine pointed out) and committed by someone other than Mark since it is a complicated enough thing to require a full review. And did you ever follow through on getting your commit privileges, Mark? While you can't commit this patch you can definitely help with maintaining it (and other things =). -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20120412/f5b70f5f/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4