> The point I really wanted to make is that many of the fields in the > frame object belong elsewhere and adding new fields to the frame object > is generally a bad idea. I disagree with that statement, and don't think you have offered sufficient proof of it. The structure may look irregular to you, but maybe you just need to get used to it. Factually, I don't think that *many* of the fields belong elsewhere. The majority of the fields clearly belongs where it is, and there is nothing wrong with adding new fields if there is a need for it. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4