A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-April/118626.html below:

[Python-Dev] Change to yield-from implementation

[Python-Dev] Change to yield-from implementation [Python-Dev] Change to yield-from implementationAntoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Mon Apr 9 14:46:05 CEST 2012
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:24:07 +1200
Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
> Mark Shannon wrote:
> 
> > We have recently removed the f_yieldfrom field from the frame object.
> > (http://bugs.python.org/issue14230)
> 
> Hey, wait a minute. Did anyone consider the performance effect
> of that change on deeply nested yield-froms?

What's the point? Apart from naïve toy examples of traversing trees, I
don't think "deeply nested yield-froms" are likely to be
performance-critical.

Regards

Antoine.


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4