On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: .. > But that's exactly what we don't *want* you to do! Because (unless you > are a numerical wizard) you probably aren't doing the error analysis > needed to avoid the "unexpected extra point" problem due to floating > point inaccuracies. For your own good, we want you to state the count > and let us deliver the number of points you want. But the likely result will be that a non-wizard will find that range() does not work with floats, reach for some_name_here(), find the absence of step option, curse the developers, write count=int((stop-start)/step) and leave this with a nagging thought that (s)he forgot +/-1 somewhere.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4