A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-September/113694.html below:

[Python-Dev] range objects in 3.x

[Python-Dev] range objects in 3.x [Python-Dev] range objects in 3.xAlexander Belopolsky alexander.belopolsky at gmail.com
Tue Sep 27 20:48:51 CEST 2011
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
..
> But that's exactly what we don't *want* you to do! Because (unless you
> are a numerical wizard) you probably aren't doing the error analysis
> needed to avoid the "unexpected extra point" problem due to floating
> point inaccuracies. For your own good, we want you to state the count
> and let us deliver the number of points you want.

But the likely result will be that a non-wizard will find that range()
does not work with floats, reach for some_name_here(), find the
absence of step option, curse the developers, write
count=int((stop-start)/step) and leave this with a nagging thought
that (s)he forgot +/-1 somewhere.
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4