I as well think the construct should support other types as it sounds an awful lot like the missing for(;;) loop construct. Concerning the api, if we use spread(start, step, count) we don't rely on a division method even though the caller probably does. Just mentioning another option. --Yuval Greenfield -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20110927/d9ca994b/attachment-0001.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4