2011/9/21 Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net>: > Am 21.09.2011 15:25, schrieb Ezio Melotti: > >>> @@ -1205,6 +1214,18 @@ >>> minitemsize = 4 >>> tests.append(UnsignedLongTest) >>> >>> + at unittest.skipIf(not have_long_long, 'need long long support') >> >> I think this would read better with skipUnless and s/have/has/: >> >> @unittest.skipUnless(HAS_LONG_LONG, 'need long long support') > > I don't think so. "skip if not" reads pretty well for me, while I > always have to think twice about "unless" -- may be a non-native- > speaker thing. You might also not program in Ruby enough. :) -- Regards, Benjamin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4