A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-September/113598.html below:

[Python-Dev] Do we have interest in a clang buildbot?

[Python-Dev] Do we have interest in a clang buildbot? [Python-Dev] Do we have interest in a clang buildbot?Stefan Krah stefan at bytereef.org
Thu Sep 15 20:27:22 CEST 2011
Jesus Cea <jcea at jcea.es> wrote:
> I am seeing a few commits related to clang (a C compiler, alternative
> to GCC), but we ¿only? have a buildbot using clang as the compiler.
> 
> If there is interest, I would deploy 32 and 64 bits buildbots under my
> current OpenIndiana buildbot.

I think it makes sense. clang has different warnings and the versions
>= 2.9 apparently optimize extremely aggressively. Probably it would
be most useful to run these bots with -O2 (and not --with-pydebug).


Stefan Krah


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4