RetroSearch Browse

Thu Sep 15 19:50:06 CEST 2011 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-September/113597.html

+2 for promoting naming consistency and putting metadata where it's supposed
to be.

--Yuval
On Sep 15, 2011 9:23 AM, "Éric Araujo" <merwok at netwok.org> wrote:
> Le 13/09/2011 18:34, Michael Foord a écrit :
>> On 13/09/2011 16:57, Éric Araujo wrote:
>>> (IIRC PyPI will require us to play games to have both
>>> 2.x and 3.x versions of distutils2.)
>>
>> What I'm doing for unittest2.
>> [...]
>> 2) I have a pypi project called unittestpy3k that holds the Python 3
>> version of unittest2
>>
>> Projects using unittest2 for Python 3 then have a dependency on
>> unittest2py3k - but the actual Python package name is unittest2.
>
> That’s what I call playing games. I think it would make more sense to
> push 2.x-compatible and 3.x-compatible sdists to PyPI (with an
> appropriate 'Programming Language :: Python :: 2' or '3' classifier) and
> have the download tools be smart.
>
> Regards
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ubershmekel%40gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20110915/0841bce4/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-September/113597.html below:

[Python-Dev] Packaging in Python 2 anyone ?