A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-October/114253.html below:

[Python-Dev] Packaging and binary distributions

[Python-Dev] Packaging and binary distributions [Python-Dev] Packaging and binary distributionsPaul Moore p.f.moore at gmail.com
Sun Oct 30 23:52:44 CET 2011
On 30 October 2011 18:04, Ned Deily <nad at acm.org> wrote:
> Has anyone analyzed the current packages on PyPI to see how many provide
> binary distributions and in what format?

A very quick and dirty check:

dmg: 5
rpm: 12
msi: 23
dumb: 132
wininst: 364
egg: 2570

That's number of packages with binary distributions in that format.
It's hard to be sure about egg distributions, as many of these could
be pure-python (there's no way I know, from the PyPI metadata, to
check this).

This is 2913 packages with some form of binary distribution out of
16615 that have a single release on PyPI. I skipped 398 with multiple
releases as I wasn't sure how to capture the data for those... I
suspect they include some important cases, though (I know lxml is in
there, for example).

So: 17% of packages have any binary release. Of those, 88% have eggs,
12% have wininst and the rest are under 5%. Put another way, 2% of all
packages have wininst installers. And 15% have eggs. That's not a lot.

Paul.
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4