Le Mardi 25 Octobre 2011 09:09:56 vous avez écrit : > If it's the byte APIs (i.e. using bytes as file names), then I'm -1 on > this proposal. People that explicitly use bytes for file names deserve > to get whatever exact platform semantics the platform has to offer. This > is true on Unix, and it is also true on Windows. For your information, it took me something like 3 months (when I was working on the issue #12281) to understand exactly how Windows handles undecodable bytes and unencodable characters. I did a lot of tests on different Windows versions (XP, Vista and Seven, the behaviour changed in Windows Vista). I had to take notes because it is really complex. Well, I wanted to understand exactly *all* code pages, including CP_UTF7 and CP_UTF8, not only the most common ones like cp1252 or cp932. See the dedicated section in my book to learn more about these funtions: http://www.haypocalc.com/tmp/unicode-2011-07-20/html/operating_systems.html#encode- and-decode-functions Some information are available in MultiByteToWideChar and WideCharToMultiByte documentation, but they are not well explained :-p Victor
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4