On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 20:58, Mark Hammond <mhammond at skippinet.com.au> wrote: > On 24/10/2011 12:56 PM, Michael Urman wrote: >> >> On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 17:15, Mark Hammond<skippy.hammond at gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> How about abusing the existing flags for this purpose - eg: >>> >>> % py -3? >>> % py -2.7? >> >> I would have expected that to launch an interactive python shell of >> the appropriate version. Does it do something else today? > > That is what it does today without the trailing '?' character. My idea was > to allow the trailing '?' to behave like the proposed --which. Oh, I read right over question mark without seeing it. I wonder if that's a notch against it from a documentation standpoint or just my own personal quirk. (I'm not used to thinking of it as a command line flag, partly due to my unix years.) Thanks for explaining!
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4