Hi, This is my first time on Python-dev, so I apologize for my newbie-ness. I have been doing some performance experiments with memcmp, and I was surprised that memcmp wasn't faster than it was in Python. I did a whole, long analysis and came up with some very simple results. Before I put in a tracker bug report, I wanted to present my findings and make sure they were repeatable to others (isn't that the nature of science? ;) as well as offer discussion. The analysis is a pdf and is here: http://www.picklingtools.com/study.pdf The testcases are a tarball here: http://www.picklingtools.com/PickTest5.tar.gz I have three basic recommendations in the study: I am curious what other people think. Gooday, Richie -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20111020/a68bda29/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4